06/28/2023 / By Ethan Huff
It is official: Hunter Biden demanded money from a Communist Chinese Party (CCP)-linked businessman in 2017 through WhatsApp while “sitting” next to Joe, his father.
This was confirmed by Chris Clark, Hunter attorney, just one day after the House Ways and Means Committee released Internal Revenue Service (IRS) whistleblower testimony that Hunter used his close proximity to Joe as a cudgel to get what he wanted from the Chinese businessman.
Clark released a carefully crafted statement that aims to distance Joe from his son’s scandal by framing Hunter as some kind of victim in all this.
“The DOJ investigation covered a period which was a time of turmoil and addiction for my client,” Clark wrote about the Department of Justice’s work on the matter.
“Any verifiable words or actions of my client in the midst of a horrible addiction are solely his own and have no connection to anyone in his family.”
(Related: Nearly 10,000 photos from Hunter Biden’s laptop have been published online showing his criminality.)
The same day that Clark released this statement, Breitbart News reported that the Biden Crime Family received $5.1 million in cash payments within just 10 days of Hunter demanding it of the CCP-linked businessman via WhatApp.
Said businessman worked closely with a Chinese energy conglomerate called CEFC Energy, according to a 2020 Senate report on the Biden Crime Family.
On Aug. 4, 2017, CEFC Infrastructure Investment (U.S.) LLC, a subsidiary of Ye Jianming’s CEFC China Energy Company, sent Owasco, Hunter’s law firm, a $100,000 payment that was identified for “potential criminal financial activity.”
Four days later on August 8, CEFC Infrastructure Investment wired $5 million to the bank account for Hudson West III, these funds potentially having originated from a loan issued from the account of a Hong Kong-based investment company called Northern International Capital Holdings (NICH).
NICH was, at one time, a “substantial shareholder” in CEFC International Limited, though it is unclear whether Hunter was half-owner of Hudson West III at the time this massive payment was made.
What we do know is that starting on August 8 all the way through to Sept. 25, 2018, Hudson West III sent frequent payments to Owasco, all of them described as “consulting fees.” These alleged “consulting fees” amounted to $4,790,375.25 in just over one year.
Investigators from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reportedly sought out location data to confirm that Pedo Joe was in the room with Hunter at the time he messaged the CCP-linked businessman. So far, there is no indication that the FBI was successful in this endeavor, though there is strong speculation.
“Investigators wanted to get the location data to confirm Joe Biden was in the room when Hunter used him as leverage but there is no confidence the FBI obtained that data,” tweeted the GOP House Oversight Committee about the matter.
According to whistleblowers, Assistant U.S. Attorney Lesley Wolf blocked U.S. Attorney David Weiss from asking any questions about an email found on Hunter’s laptop detailing a business deal with CEFC that mentioned: “Ten hold by H for the big guy,” the “big guy” presumably referring to Pedo Joe.
These same whistleblowers claimed that Wolf stopped questioning about “the big guy” in order to prevent the investigation from moving in the direction of implicating Pedo Joe in the scandal.
It is widely believed that the 10 percent “held by H for the big guy” refers to Pedo Joe and the 10 percent cut he was to receive from CEFC, which is controlled by State Energy HK Limited, a company tied to the $1.3 million in collective payments that were made to members of the Biden Crime Family.
The latest news about the Biden Crime Family can be found at Treason.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
Biden, Biden crime family, bribery, CCP, China, Chinese Communist Party, corruption, FBI corruption, hunter, Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, left cult, money supply, shakedown, treason, WhatsApp, whistle-blower
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 FACTCHECK.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. FactCheck.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. FactCheck.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.