07/24/2024 / By Ethan Huff
In partnership with John Leake, Dr. Peter McCullough spent about an hour investigating the events surrounding the recent attempt on Donald Trump’s life at a rally in Butler, Penn. The two discovered that a lot of the narrative makes no sense.
Though perched inside the building on multiple floors, local law enforcement in Beaver County was not at all present on the rooftop of the American Glass Research building where Thomas Matthew Crooks, 20, tried to kill the former president, which begs the question why?
Local police were also notified in advance that a suspicious person was on top of the building, but nothing was done to stop him, nor did local law enforcement bother to initiate its active shooter protocol once Crooks started firing.
Though the two groups were supposed to be working together to protect Trump and his supporters, local police failed to communicate with Secret Service about getting Trump to a secure location once shots started to be fired.
“Police snipers on the roof used binoculars to track the shooter’s position and did not warn the USSS below to get Trump off the stage,” McCullough and Leake further found.
“Police snipers under scope vision allowed the shooter to get set and shoot six rounds at Trump. A police sniper got off the scope and looked with the naked eye to be sure the shooter had taken his shots and never looked down at Trump.”
(Related: The deep state claims that Iran will now try to end Trump’s life in retaliation for the Abraham Accords and the former president’s commitment to Israel.)
Another strange anomaly is the fact that after a local police officer shot Crooks, nobody went up on the roof immediately afterwards to take away the gun and confirm Crooks’ status as either injured or dead.
“All the while, there was no active shooter protocol, and no warning was given to Trump or the audience,” McCullough and Leake further said.
All in all, there were six shots fired at the event. Three of the shots remain unknown and were possibly return fire.
The McCullough Foundation released an in-depth video about the investigation, which is just over one hour and six minutes, that you can watch below:
MUST-SEE: Detailed Analysis of Trump Assassination Attempt – A critical evaluation of video recordings and witness testimony of the incident.
In this McCullough Foundation Situation Update, Dr. Peter McCullough and John Leake provide an in-depth analysis of all details… pic.twitter.com/SnJ86a1rqL
— McCullough Foundation (@McCulloughFund) July 16, 2024
Peggy Hall from The Healthy American also posted a video about the strange things she observed about the Trump shooting, which you can watch below:
“Nothing was done right and everything looks like it was intentional,” said the “SaltyGoat” (@SaltyGoat17) X account about the Trump shooting.
“One or two mistakes is one thing,” added “The Vigilant Fox” (@VigilantFox). “But when you have 10-plus anomalies on the same day, it certainly begins to look intentional.”
“It’s also all the organized pushback,” said “Ajay Khindri” (@secretmovement1). “Same defensive answers, same reflexive explanations from intelligence. Probabilities favor foul play.”
Another strange fact is that media networks like CNN, MSNBC, BBC, and even FOX News that normally do not broadcast Trump rallies decided to broadcast the one in Butler live – did they know something was going to happen?
“The whole thing was a setup,” believes “JasonCryptoApe” (@JasonCryptoFTW). “Police and maybe even Secret Service was in on it.”
You can keep up with the latest news about Trump’s campaign for a second presidential term at Trump.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
anomalies, assassination, Butler, conspiracy, Dangerous, deception, deep state, Donald Trump, Dr. Peter McCullough, false-flag, John Leake, law enforcement, MediaFactWatch, national security, Police, real investigations, rigged, Secret Service, Trump, Trump hate, unexplained, violence, White House
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 FACTCHECK.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. FactCheck.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. FactCheck.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.